Comparative Analysis of Conventional, Series, Parallel, LLC & CLLC SiC DAB Converters 48V–380V 1kW MATLAB Simulink

MATLAB / SimulinkPower Electronics & ConvertersSiC DAB Topology Comparison

Actual project demonstration: this player loads the MP4 mapped to this exact project page. Use the controls to play, pause, enable sound and seek. If the embedded player is blocked by a browser/CDN rule, use the direct MP4 link above rather than a generic image.

Project summary

Short project summary

Comparative Analysis of Conventional, Series, Parallel, LLC & CLLC SiC DAB Converters 48V–380V 1kW MATLAB Simulink is an engineering research project focused on 48 V to 380 V, 1 kW SiC DAB and resonant DAB topology comparison across efficiency, ripple, soft switching and dynamic response. The page combines the project video with a structured technical overview so researchers can understand the likely model architecture, study workflow and outputs before discussing files or customization.

Technical overview

Technical overview and study context

The simulation platform inferred for this project is MATLAB / Simulink. Because the exact model version and deliverable set can vary, the project video should be treated as the visual reference while the final file package is confirmed against the requested scope. The title specifically references 48V, 380V, 1kW, which should remain part of any validation or comparative study.

This project is categorized under Power Electronics & Converters and focuses on 48 V to 380 V, 1 kW SiC DAB and resonant DAB topology comparison across efficiency, ripple, soft switching and dynamic response. The technical page is intended to explain what the simulation studies, how it can be validated, and which outputs should be reviewed before extending it into a new research contribution.

Research problem

Problem statement and research intent

A high-ratio 48 V to 380 V isolated converter can be implemented with conventional or resonant DAB variants, but topology choice changes circulating current, soft-switching range, reactive energy, ripple, component stress and control complexity.

Specific project topic: Comparative Analysis of Conventional, Series, Parallel, LLC & CLLC SiC DAB Converters 48V–380V 1kW MATLAB Simulink. This dedicated page keeps the exact technical topic in the heading, metadata, methodology and internal links rather than sending researchers to a generic software category.

Research objectives

Project objectives and study scope

  • Build comparable conventional, series, parallel, LLC and CLLC DAB models with common power/voltage targets.
  • Use SiC switch characteristics or consistent loss assumptions across all cases.
  • Compare steady-state transfer, ripple and semiconductor/magnetic stress.
  • Evaluate soft-switching conditions and efficiency-related losses across load.
  • Compare transient response and control complexity under equivalent operating changes.
System / topology

System topology and software platform

Software / platform: MATLAB / Simulink.

Engineering domain: Power Electronics & Converters.

System focus: 48 V to 380 V, 1 kW SiC DAB and resonant DAB topology comparison across efficiency, ripple, soft switching and dynamic response. The exact topology, ratings and solver settings should be taken from the actual model rather than inferred from the title alone.

Major model components

Main model / simulation components

48 V source and 380 V DC output
Dual active bridges with SiC switching
High-frequency transformer
Series/parallel/LLC/CLLC resonant networks
Phase-shift/frequency or hybrid control
Loss, ripple and dynamic-performance measurement
Methodology

Recommended simulation workflow

  1. Normalize transformer ratio, switching frequency range and rated power for a fair comparison.
  2. Validate each topology at the same input/output operating point.
  3. Measure RMS/peak currents, resonant tank variables and output ripple.
  4. Apply consistent semiconductor and magnetic loss models before comparing efficiency.
  5. Sweep load or power command to identify soft-switching ranges.
  6. Present a multi-metric trade-off rather than declaring one topology universally superior.
Important parameters & simulation cases

Parameters, operating cases and validation plan

Important parameters should be read directly from the supplied model and documented with units, assumptions and software version. Typical validation should include a clearly defined baseline, one or more parameter or operating-point variations, and disturbance or comparative cases only where they are technically relevant to this topic.

Title-specific terms to preserve during validation: 48V, 380V, 1kW. Numeric values are not invented on this page; they must come from the actual simulation files or the referenced study.

Expected results / graphs / scopes

Key outputs and plots to analyze

Available plots depend on the project files and software version. For this topic, the most useful engineering outputs typically include:

  • Voltage conversion and output regulation
  • Primary/secondary and resonant-tank currents
  • ZVS/ZCS operating regions
  • Output voltage/current ripple
  • Estimated conduction/switching/magnetic losses and efficiency
  • Transient response and component-stress comparison
Research extension

Possible novelty and further research directions

For a new scholar title, the existing project can be extended without claiming novelty until the proposed change is tested against current literature and validated technically. Practical directions include:

  • Multi-objective topology optimization for efficiency, ripple and power density.
  • Thermal/electro-thermal SiC loss model across switching frequency.
  • Adaptive control that switches modulation strategy across load.
  • Hardware-oriented magnetic design and parasitic sensitivity analysis.
Applications

Where this project can be applied

EV auxiliary/high-voltage interfaces
Energy storage converters
DC microgrids
Isolated high-ratio DC conversion
Advantages and limitations

Engineering strengths and limitations to consider

AdvantagesStructured simulation workflow, repeatable operating cases and project-specific technical outputs can support comparative engineering studies.
LimitationsResults depend on model assumptions, parameter accuracy, solver settings and software version. A simulation result should not be presented as experimental validation unless physical testing has actually been performed.
Related research topics

Research topics connected to this project

This project also connects naturally with related engineering searches and research terminology such as SiC DAB Topology Comparison simulation</strong>, <strong>SiC DAB Topology Comparison MATLAB / Simulink</strong>, <strong>Power Electronics & Converters research project</strong>, <strong>SiC DAB Topology Comparison engineering model. These phrases are included as contextual topic language rather than repeated keyword blocks.

SiC DAB Topology Comparison
Power Electronics & Converters
MATLAB / Simulink
48V
380V
1kW
Domain & platform hubs

Explore the broader topic cluster

Project package

Files, customization and technical support

Ready project-file packages are typically priced between 100$ and 200$ depending on model complexity and included files. Additional implementation, new research objectives, optimization, assignments, thesis writing, paper preparation, result interpretation and other services are quoted separately after scope review.

Ready filesModel/source files when available
ConfigurationSimulation setup and parameters
ResultsAvailable scopes, graphs or solver outputs
CustomizationNew cases, controls and research extensions
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What software is used for Comparative Analysis of Conventional, Series, Parallel, LLC & CLLC SiC DAB Converters 48V–380V 1kW MATLAB Simulink?

The project is classified under MATLAB / Simulink. Confirm the required software release before ordering or requesting modifications.

Can this project be modified for a new research title?

Yes. The project can be reviewed against a new abstract or base paper and extended with additional operating cases, algorithms, parameters, plots or validation steps where technically appropriate.

What results are included?

The video demonstrates the project visually. Exact result plots and source/model files vary by project and should be confirmed before delivery. Additional plots can be implemented as a separate service.

Can this be used for PhD or thesis work?

It can serve as a simulation starting point. Research contribution, novelty, validation and literature positioning must be developed specifically for the scholar's problem statement and cannot be guaranteed from a ready project alone.

Related how-to guides

Learn the method behind this research topic

Related PhD research titles

Extend this project into a focused research study

Related projects

Explore similar engineering projects

Contact / request project

Request this project or a customized research version

Share your title, abstract or base paper, required software version and expected plots. Custom simulation, optimization, documentation, thesis and publication-oriented technical support are quoted separately.

Get full code + support
WhatsAppInstagramFacebook